Tuesday, June 16, 2015

Von Beringe's Southern California Upright Timber Giant

Yes, the title of this posting is correct: I have indeed dubbed the creature in my famous video after myself... it is my right after all. The name "Von Beringe's Southern California Upright Timber Giant" will soon ring through the halls of academia as I am proclaimed the discoverer of the creature commonly misidentified as Bigfoot.

Here I provide wood carvings of my associate Monk and myself for any institutions that would like to get a head start on adding us to the annals of natural history.



Further evidence of my astonishing discovery can be found below. In the video you'll see Monk & I leaving camp less than an hour before the creatures appears. Not only does this offering contradict any notion of CGI enhancement, it also provides a source of scale, supporting my claim that the hairy beast must have been upwards of 8 1/2 feet large.



For those interested in breaking down my videos, you should know--for the sake of scale, yaw, pitch & roll--that Monk and I were camped on a steep incline in the area in Griffith Park known as "The Old Zoo." 

Thank you in advance for your good wishes on my history-making discovery.

All the best,

RVB

28 comments:

  1. you didnt discover bigfoot asshole.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Please take your filthy comments elsewhere.

      Delete
  2. Is this real, are you serious? Is this a joke or something for real?

    ReplyDelete
  3. i think you're right about the size of your timber giant, ronald.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Bigfoot aka Sasquatch has been around for centuries. If anyone "discovered" him it was Patterson, not you. I haven't even heard of you until today.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The point is: you've heard of me. Thank you for your support.

      Delete
  5. Even those guys in the video are CGI. All jerky and stupid-looking, SO OBVIOUS, just like your "Timber Giant." What a waste of time.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Why do I have the sneaking suspicion that it is you who is jerky and stupid-looking?

      Delete
    2. You call yourself a professional but you resort to name calling banter?
      I tend to call that childish and unprofessional. Try to answer people with some dignity and respect no matter what they say.

      Delete
    3. You are right, my dear. I apologize for my uncalled for and childish response, Ms. Gem, utterly and completely.

      Delete
    4. Apology accepted. There is so many different opinions on this subject that there will always be a controversy until a body is provided. Always stick to what you believe and ignore the people who resort to name calling and immoral comments. I do believe in Bigfoot and always will..but a body would be nice don't you think?That way the non-believers can move on to another topic.

      Delete
  6. Replies
    1. I am known by many names. Your adoration is accepted.

      Delete
  7. After reading your bio and gazing upon your mustache and pith helmet....swipe right!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Sorry I believe in Bigfoot but this evidence is dicey to say the least.
    Your are trying prove a size comparison with pictures for reference.
    Look at bottom where shows camera 1 (here is your mistakes:
    1. Location of subject lined up with camera 1. 2. Clearly the "human
    subject is further away then the "Bigfoot" subject. 3. And final
    film on YouTube makes the "Bigfoot" gait to fluid like it was either
    rehearsed or very carefully thought out for how "Bigfoot" walks.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I believe Thinker Thunker's breakdown is the best evidence I can provide on this matter.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h5fmQtDDfwo

      Delete
    2. His view does make it a bit more plausible. I wish though he could of at least put his video credentials somewhere saying where he could prove not just a average person but some one familiar with video editing, etc.. To make him more believable about his technique especially when trying to credit the distance. When he mentioned reading manuals on trap cameras he kind of lost his ability to be taken total seriously as knowing video and technology.

      Delete
    3. In my opinion Thinker Thunker has the best grasp on my video. He is well-versed in common sense, animation and camera technology... definitely more than most. I retrieved the footage from the trailcam myself and I assure you his entire assessment of the video is accurate. He's correct about the creature's size and its distance from the camera... and he's right that the notion of CGI enhancement is absolutely preposterous.


      Delete
  9. So you filmed this by the Hollywood sign and the Griffith Observatory at the Old L.A. Zoo?......lol Bamboozled again. hahaha

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I usually don't enter other conversations but JR can you totally disprove the video evidence? By the way location doesn't always mean you can't find something hidden there. I can't totally say this is a false or true video but like all the others it is interesting. Bigfoot has been around many years and was dubbed "Bigfoot" for the size of footprint left behind.

      Delete
  10. Yes my good man, that is correct. There are strange goings-on in that section of the park... particularly after sundown.

    As you seem to know, Griffith Park covers 4,310 acres of land, making it one of the largest, most untamed parks in Southern California.

    As you have probably gathered from my trail-cam footage, hirsute humanoids wander the grounds after dark. If you doubt my veracity, you should try staying there overnight to see for yourself. At some point during the night, particularly in the dense underbrush, a hulking man-creature might attempt to arouse you.

    Thank you for your thoughtful comment,

    RVB

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ronald I know that if some of the non believers actually witnessed any thing remotely like bigfoot they would have night terrors for the rest of their lives. Which if I ever heard about it would put a smile on my face. :)

      Delete
    2. Truer words have never been spoken, Ms. Gem.

      Delete
  11. You will need a lot more than this to appease academia, but I assume you are inherently aware of that. There is an excellent paper out on dental forensics in regards to some deer bones found with tooth marks. Still hasn't been disputed, to my knowledge, and I would be highly surprised if it ever is disputed successfully. Has a few skeptical scientists scratching their heads... to say the least.. Notably, the media has been hush, hush about it as has academia (which is not so surprising). Word of advice: Beware the ego, it has caused the downfall of many. Good find...

    ReplyDelete
  12. I doubt the Timber Giant feasts on ungulates. They are exceedingly difficult to catch, even for quick-twitch quadrupeds. An 800 lb. non-tool using biped would have an even tougher time...

    ReplyDelete